Demo case:
Contract Review Agentv2.3#run-00187
1 blocked · 2 loggedBlocked by GRC
GRC Events
R-PII-001PII — Person nameMask
Duration
38.2s
Total cost
$0.0142
Tokens in / out
2,847 / 412
Steps
6
Quality score
72 / 100
GRC events
1 blocked · 2 logged
Intent
RegularCopy AVI ID
Select a step in the timeline to see its detail
Elements & RAG
NDA_draft_v4.pdflegal_db toolPII Guard (system)gpt-4oRAG corpus
RAG chunks — by relevance
0.91
Section 8 — Liability cap
0.87
Section 12 — Indemnification
0.83
Section 15 — Governing law
0.61
Section 3 — Definitions
0.14
Section 21 — Boilerplate notices (below threshold — not used)
GRC Enforcement
R-PII-001 triggered at step — PII — Person name · Action: Mask
R-PII-001MaskPII — Person name
Before:
Sarah MitchellAfter:
[PERSON_NAME]Quality & Hallucination Signals
Goal completion
72 / 100
Groundedness
88 / 100
Faithfulness
91 / 100
Policy compliance
85 / 100
Conversation Replay
Session sess-7A3F1 turn2026-06-22 14:29:50 — 2026-06-22 14:30:39
Review the uploaded NDA and flag any unusual liability clauses. Summarise in plain English.
The NDA contains three non-standard clauses: (1) mutual liability cap set at 2× annual contract value — unusual for software NDAs which typically cap at 1×; (2) indemnification extends to third-party IP claims without carve-outs; (3) governing law is Delaware but arbitration clause specifies AAA rules, creating a conflict… [truncated]
PII masked in processing